Tasha Mellins-Cohen and Siân Harris of COUNTER Metrics, explain how COUNTER works, what it counts, and why your editorial and publishing teams should consider it essential business intelligence.
Every decade or so, scholarly publishing is forced to adapt to disruption. But today’s crisis is different. We’re not just facing economic or technological change—we’re watching the infrastructure of science itself come under political threat.
We asked our colleagues a simple question: If you could read the scholarly publishing industry news headlines of 2030 what would they say?
Angela Cochran explores the wide-ranging impact of public access policies on publishers, researchers, and the integrity of the scholarly record, highlighting key changes from NIH, DOE, NASA, and NSF.
In this Q&A, Tim shares insights on KGL Smart Review integration partner, DataSeer’s latest innovation, SnapShot.
By creating work that follows accessibility recommendations, authors will not only make their research available to a wider audience, they may also enjoy a smoother path to publication.
The role of the editor-in-chief is undergoing a profound transformation. For societies and publishers, selecting the right EIC is a critical step that can shape the trajectory of the journal and determine its future influence.
AI is still very much a hot topic, but with the European Accessibility Act deadline, second Trump administration, growing research fraud, and misuse of technology, there is a whole new slate of issues for publishers to think about.
In years to come, 2024 will likely be remembered as the year Artificial Intelligence truly exploded in academic publishing—a defining period that saw the industry move beyond the “experimental phase” and start to implement the technology available to boldly reshape its future.
